Scientific capability / Topological Cryptic-Pocket Discovery

Find where a hidden opening deserves a closer look.

When a target offers no obvious pocket, BioTwin can examine local structural changes across conformations and nominate regions for investigation. Persistent homology supplies the structural signal; access geometry and chemical context determine what to do with it.

Current work Exploratory computational studies

A local comparison across conformations

The method follows loop-like features in the protein’s Cα geometry and compares their persistence across static or generated conformations. Candidate regions are checked against background and null controls. A strong local difference suggests where to inspect the structure; it does not measure the fraction of time a pocket is open.

Topology already has a place in pocket discovery

CrypToth combines persistent homology with mixed-solvent molecular dynamics. BioTwin’s specific route uses local Cα comparisons and can feed candidate regions into its all-atom fit/access and ensemble-ligandability methods. This creates a staged investigation: locate an opening, test whether a molecule can enter, then examine whether useful chemistry is available there. The combined biological benefit remains a target-specific question.

The controls changed the interpretation

Selected known-site and two-structure studies localized useful regions. A broader apo-only panel did not establish a general discovery advantage, and a structural null explained much of one apparent mutation-specific signal. Those findings make matched structures and negative controls essential. Side-chain pockets may also be missed by a Cα representation.

Further reading

Give a hidden-pocket hypothesis a fair test.

A target, suitable structural controls and a clear pocket-finding baseline define a useful investigation.