Scientific capability / Non-Cysteine Covalent Design

Keep the target. Reconsider the chemistry.

When the useful interface has no accessible cysteine, the next question is whether another residue can support selective engagement. BioTwin surfaces non-cysteine chemistry as a concrete alternative to investigate.

Current work Candidate-planning method

Recognition still comes first

The research toolkit considers serine, threonine, tyrosine, lysine and histidine-directed hypotheses alongside geometry, hydrolysis and competing thiol reactivity. The aim is a residue-and-warhead pairing that earns a chemistry experiment. Simply replacing one electrophile with another is insufficient.

A demonstrated planning step

An executed BioTwin planning example surfaced non-cysteine chemistry when accessible cysteine was excluded, together with interface, allosteric and recruitment alternatives. That demonstrates candidate guidance with requirements to review. It does not establish a successful non-cysteine compound or complete automatic filtering of unsuitable routes.

Compare more than target reactivity

A matched series should test recognition, target reaction, hydrolysis and competing reactions. Paralog analysis and plasma-competition models could help choose the counterscreens; the joined calculation needs target-specific inputs.

A missing cysteine need not end the investigation.

Describe the target, recognition element and chemistry constraint so an alternative-residue assessment can be scoped.